Saturday, 21 December 2013

PRACTICAL 4: ANGLE OF REPOSE


Apparatus and Materials:

Funnel, hopper, stopper, ruler, Magnesium Stearate as glidant, 100g of 355, 500, 850 micron and various size of sand, newspaper, weighing boats, spatula and weighing balance

Procedures:

1.      100g of 355 micron sand, without the addition of glidant was measured by using weighing balance.

2.      The sand was then inserted into a funnel.

3.      The funnel was then lifted up and the sand was left to form a heap.

4.      The height, slope and the diameter of the heap of the sand was then measured by using the ruler.

5.      The angle repose of the heap of the sand was measured.

6.      Steps 1 to 5 were repeated by using 100g of 500 micron, 850 micron and various size of sand respectively, without the addition of glidant.

7.      Steps 1 to 5 were repeated by using 90g of 355 micron, 500 micron, 850 micron and various size of sand respectively. For each material, 10g of magnesium stearate was added as a glidant.

Results:




a) Angle of repose with and without 1% glidant

Diameter of stopper is 4.70 cm

Radian of stopper is 2.35 cm

Materials/sand (microns)
Height of the heap without glidant (cm)
Slope of the heap without glidant (cm)
Angle of repose  without glidant
Height of the heap with 1% magnesium stearate (cm)
Slope of the heap with 1% magnesium stearate (cm)
Angle of repose  with glidant
150
2.2
3.2
43.11°
3.8
4.5
58.27°
355
2.0
3.1
40.40°
2.3
3.3
44.38°
500
1.9
3.0
38.96°
2.1
3.2
41.78°
850
1.8
2.9
37.45°
2.1
3.2
41.78°
Various sizes
2.3
3.3
44.38°
2.2
3.2
43.11°

 

Calculations:

1.      Angle of repose without glidant:

 

a)      Sand 150 microns : tan θ = 2.2cm/2.35cm
                                                   θ = 43.11°

 

b)      Sand 355 microns: tan θ = 2.0cm/2.35cm

          θ = 40.40°

 
 

c)      Sand 500 microns: tan θ = 1.9cm/2.35cm

                                                 θ = 38.96°

 

d)     Sand 850 microns: tan θ = 1.8cm/2.35cm 
                           
                                      θ = 37.45°

 
 

e)      Various size:          tan θ = 2.3cm/2.35cm

                                     θ = 44.38°

 

 

2.      Angle of repose with 1% glidant:

 

a)      Sand 150 microns: tan θ = 3.8cm/2.35cm
                                     θ = 58.27°

 

b)      Sand 355 microns: tan θ = 2.3cm/2.35cm
                                     Î¸ = 44.38°

 

c)      Sand 500 microns: tan θ = 2.1cm/2.35cm
                             
                                     θ = 41.78°

 

d)     Sand 850 microns: tan θ = 2.1cm/2.35cm
                                     θ = 41.78°

 

e)      Various size:            tan θ = 2.2cm/2.35cm
                                       θ = 43.11°

 

 

 

 

b)  Angle of repose with and without 5% glidant

Diameter of stopper is 5.00 cm

Radian of stopper is 2.50 cm.

Materials/ sand (mm)
Height of the heap without glidant (cm)
Slope of the heap without glidant (cm)
Angle of repose without glidant
Height of the heap with 5% magnesium stearate (cm)
Slope of the heap with 5% magnesium stearate (cm)
Angle of repose with glidant
150
3.90
4.6
57.34°
4.10
4.8
58.63°
355
2.20
3.3
41.35°
3.50
4.3
54.46°
500
1.90
3.1
37.23°
2.40
3.5
43.83°
850
1.80
3.1
35.75°
2.80
3.8
48.23°
Various sizes
2.40
3.5
43.83°
3.00
3.9
50.19°

 

Calculations:

1) Angle of repose without glidant:

a)      150 microns : tan  θ = 3.9cm/2.5cm
      θ = 57.34 °

b)      355 microns :  tan θ = 2.2cm/2.5cm
      θ = 41.35 °

c)      500 microns : tan θ = 1.9cm/2.5cm
                 θ = 37.75 °

d)     850 microns : tan  θ = 1.8cm/2.5cm
      θ = 35.75 °

e)      Various sizes : tan θ = 2.4cm/2.5cm
     θ = 43.83 °

 

2) Angle of repose with 5% glidant:

a)      150 microns : tan  θ = 4.1cm/2.5cm 
      θ = 58.63 °

b)      355 microns :  tan θ = 3.5cm/2.5cm
      θ = 54.46 °

c)      500 microns : tan θ = 2.4cm/2.5cm 
                 θ = 43.83 °

d)     850 microns:  tan  θ = 2.8cm/2.5cm
      θ = 48.23 °

e)      Various sizes : tan θ = 3.0cm/2.5cm
     θ = 50.19 °

 

c) Angle of repose with and without 10% glidant

Diameter of stopper is 4.80 cm

Radian of stopper is 2.40 cm

Materials/sand (mm)
Height of the heap without glidant (cm)
Slope of the heap without glidant (cm)
Angle of repose without glidant
Height of the heap with 10% magnesium stearate (cm)
Slope of the heap with 10% magnesium stearate (cm)
Angle of repose with glidant
150
3.65
4.3
56.67 °
4.60
5.2
62.45 °
355
1.90
3.1
38.37 °
4.30
4.9
60.83 °
500
1.75
2.9
36.10 °
3.50
4.2
55.56 °
850
1.75
2.9
36.10 °
3.40
4.1
54.78 °
Various sizes
2.00
3.1
39.81 °
4.15
4.7
59.96 °

 

Calculations:

1. Angle of repose without glidant:

a)      150 microns : tan  θ = 3.65cm/2.4cm
                                          θ = 56.67 °


b)      355 microns :  tan θ = 1.9cm/2.4cm
                                          θ = 38.37 °


c)      500 microns : tan θ = 1.75cm/2.4cm 
                                          θ = 36.10 °


d)     850 microns : tan  θ = 1.75cm/2.4cm 
 
      θ = 36.10 °



e)      Various sizes : tan θ = 2.0cm/2.4cm 
 
     θ = 39.81 °


2. Angle of repose with 10% glidant:

a)      150 microns : tan  θ = 4.6cm/2.4cm
 
      θ = 62.45 °

 

b)      355 microns :  tan θ = 4.3cm/2.4cm 
      θ = 60.83 °

 

c)      500 microns : tan θ = 3.5cm/2.4cm
                 θ = 55.56 °


d)     850 microns : tan  θ = 3.4cm/2.4cm 
 
      θ = 54.78 °

 

e)      Various sizes : tan θ = 4.15cm/2.4cm 
     θ = 59.96 °

 

d) Angle of repose with and without 15% glidant

Diameter of stopper is 4.6 cm

Radian of stopper is 2.3 cm.

Materials/sand (mm)
Height of the heap without glidant (cm)
Slope of the heap without glidant (cm)
Angle of repose without glidant
Height of the heap when added with 15% of magnesium stearate (cm)
Slope of the heap with 15% magnesium stearate (cm)
Angle of repose with glidant
150
2.2
3.2
43.73 °
3.8
4.4
58.82 °
355
2.0
3.0
41.00 °
3.7
4.4
58.13 °
500
1.9
2.9
39.56 °
3.5
4.2
56.69 °
850
1.8
2.9
38.05 °
3.0
3.8
52.52 °
Various sizes
2.3
3.3
45.00 °
3.3
4.0
55.12 °

 

Calculations:

1. Angle of repose without glidant

a)      150 mm : tan  θ = 2.2cm/2.3cm
                                    θ = 43.73 °

b)      355 mm :  tan θ = 2.0cm/2.3cm 
                                    θ = 41.00 °

c)      500 mm : tan θ = 1.9cm/2.3cm
                                   θ = 39.56 °

d)     850 mm : tan  θ = 1.8cm/2.3cm
                                   θ = 38.05 °

e)      Various sizes : tan θ = 2.3cm/2.3cm
                                           θ = 45.00 °



2. Angle of repose with 15% glidant

a)      150 microns : tan  θ = 3.8cm/2.3cm
θ = 58.82 °


b)      355 microns :  tan θ = 3.7cm/2.3cm
 
                              θ = 58.13 °

 

c)      500 microns : tan θ = 3.5cm/2.3cm
                                               θ = 56.69 °


d)     850 microns : tan  θ = 3.0cm/2.3cm
                                    θ = 52.52 °


e)      Various sizes : tan θ = 3.3cm/2.3cm
                                     θ = 55.12 °



Discussions:

            Based on the results obtained from the several tables above, it is clearly shown that the results of the angle of repose varies even though the same material is used. The factors that contribute to the differences in results is discussed in the question section. According to the general guide found in the Aulton’s Pharmaceutics, materials that have the angle of repose greater than 45  are materials that have poor flow properties while the materials that have the angle of repose greater than 25  are materials that have excellent flow properties.

 

Questions:

1. What is the angle of repose of the materials?

Size of particles of sand (microns)
Angle of repose
(Without Glidant)
Angle of repose
(With Glidant)
1% Glidant
5% Glidant
10% Glidant
15% Glidant
150
43.11°
58.27°
58.63°
62.45 °
58.82 °
355
40.40°
44.38°
54.46°
60.83 °
58.13 °
500
38.96°
41.78°
43.83°
55.56 °
56.69 °
850
37.45°
41.78°
48.23°
54.78 °
52.52 °
Various Size
44.38°
43.11°
50.19°
59.96 °
55.12 °







2. What are the factors that influence the angle of repose of the materials?

There are several factors that influence the angle of repose of the material. The factors can be categorized into internal and external factors. The internal factors affecting the angle of repose are the particle size, particle shape and the cohesiveness. For the external factors, they are the method of measurement and the presence of other components including moisture. For the method of measurement, the ledge and the crater methods will give a higher angle of repose than the angle of repose obtained from the heap formation. For presence of glidants and moisture will increase the angle of repose of the sand as compared to the dry sand.

3. What are the other methods that can be used to calculate angle of repose of the materials?
a)      Tilting box method

This method is used for materials which have an individual particle size less than 10 mm, non-cohesive and fine-grained. The process begins by placing the material within a box with a transparent side to observe and obtain the result for the granular test material. The result must be level and parallel to the base of the box. After that, the box is slowly tilted at the rate of 3  per second until the material begins to slide in bulk. The angle of tilt is then measured.
 b)      Fixed funnel method

A shape of a cone is formed by using the material poured through a tunnel. The tip of the funnel should be held close to the growing cone and raised when the pile grows. This is to minimize the impact of falling particles. The pouring process stops when the pile reach the targeted height or width. The height and the width of the base are measured and the inverse tangent of these ratio is calculated. the inverse tangent of this ratio is the angle of repose.
c)      Revolving /Rotating cylinder method

The material is placed in a cylinder that has a transparent face. The cylinder is rotated at a fixed speed the observations of the movement of the material within the rotating cylinder is made. The speed of rotating cylinder is slow and the granular material will be used to assume a certain angle when it flows within the rotating cylinder.



Conclusion:

            In conclusion, the angle of repose varies for every material due to the internal and the external factors contributing to the angle repose. Thus, the determination of the angle of repose should be carried out with the presence and absence of glidant at the same time. The surface charge and the interparticular friction must also be reduced in order to improve the powder flow properties and improve the readings of the angle of repose.

 

References:



2 comments:

  1. It’s really great information for becoming a better Blogger. Keep sharing, Thanks. For more details to visit Excipient Manufacurer in India

    ReplyDelete